India: the shining diamond


Much of South Asia is in conflict and makes an unstable region. We have Afghanistan. We have Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal and Bangladesh. And Myanmar is not far off.


And right in the middle of these failed states, stands the lone crusader. India has the difficult task of being in this dangerous region and provide governance, voice to people, industrialize fast enough to put at least some of the West behind, lead research, have an open society and developed financial markets… It is a stiff climb and India has been doing all of it (albeit in slightly diluted forms). It is under attack all the time – from within and outside.

Vast majority of Hindus don't thank its government for an act that changed their lives for ever – for the better: Nehru's Hindu reform bill of the late 50s. Probably an equally vast proportion among the Muslims would like to tear the government down if such a thing was done to them. Tribal in central India flirt with Maoist thugs, in rejection of government rule.
India is under attack from outside. Maoists from Nepal, terrorists from Pakistan, Bangladesh, LTTE.

Yet, India's virtues enable it to stand in this turbulent subcontinent. We hate our politicians. But thank God, we don't have anything worse. Their casualness is appalling. But politics being profession, they are quick to retract/amend, they read people's mood. And without a doubt, there is a 'wake-up call' kind of electricity at our power centres. India will respond as one – I have every hope.

Mumbai Attacks

We need a catastrophe to hit us before any consensus is built at the national level. Until then we don’t move. In so many years we could not modernize our police force by giving them better compensation, training, working conditions and staffing. Our men fought bravely, but they neither had the assessment of what they were up against, nor were they equipped. It turns out the killers had superior weaponry.

We need to ask ourselves: if an organization funded by charity and Pakistan agencies could muster such killer equipments, why do the police of this vast and powerful nation not have the best?

But a bigger question needs answering. Our foreign minister says that war with Pakistan is not an option. May be he is right. May be we need to first strengthen ourselves internally. But then would that be enough? We can not afford to do what US did in retaliation to the WTC strikes. Do we want to hit specific targets in Pakistan without waging a war? Can we afford not weakening the Pakistan Army? A war will cost huge deficits and inflation. What will be the cost of letting Pakistan go scot-free?

In any case, verbal threats to Pakistan by either India or the US would not yield anything. India will have to act alone for its interests. Despite the new found political consensus on national security, do we have any firm plan of action? Will there be a public backlash if nothing is done by the government? Unlikely. We have a long history of taking things lying down. And then we are mowed over. We call it tolerance.

Hunger


Vast areas of the country are facing acute hunger. Come to think of it, our countrymen who have identical civil rights as we, in millions of numbers, are plainly starving.

"She just stares. Occasionally opens her mouth." This is from news piece that reported the starvation in MP. The report described a baby, so weakened by hunger that she opened her mouth only occasionally to signal hunger, unable to muster the energy needed to cry. In districts of AP, the hunger is acute too. Many people eat only once a day -- rice and salt. And if a visitor arrives, some members of the host family must skip a meal. May be your eyes are moist. So are mine.

Writers and poets can go on writing heart melting pieces on hunger, on plight of human. Historically, these have proved to be some really touching writings --- connecting very well with the readers. Some have even gone on to become fodder for revolution. But most power changes swap one underclass for another. Few salty problems. The hunger has proved to be a fertile ground for Naxal recruitments. The hungry are joining an armed rebellion to bring the government down. They have succeeded to some extent. There are some parts in Chattisgarh, MP and even Maharashtra, where government has little or no administrative control. Our response has been to commit more armed and paramilitary forces to counter rebellion.

But the hunger remains. We don't need poets or writers to heal. Neither can paramilitary forces crush problems stemming from hunger. We need government and capitalism to deliver on their mandates. We need to large & efficient farms to generate the necessary food. We need factories where we can send our vast farm labour force to earn and buy this food.

Some politicians like Buddhadeb Bhattachrya have already understood this. But farm lands have become holy cows with our politicians by and large, who often surrender to vocal minorities. Anything that succeeds even marginally once, becomes a role model and subsequently a holy cow. Farm lands in the 60s, and of late the software industry?

The trouble is why isn't then copying the Gujarat model of industrialization politically fashionable?

Janjira

An interesting storytelling based on the mighty Janjira is hard. Becasuse the world has little knowledge of what went on inside this Fortress in the sea. A mere gaze at the sea fort evokes queries and you wish you knew the story behind it. You wish you could see all that these awesome walls have been witness to.
JANJIRA FLAG
The princely state of Janjira fluttered its red flag with the crescent moon, until India won independence in 1947 and merged all the princely states with the union by the following year. The state of Janjira is noted as being among the smallest of the princely States in Menon's "The Story of Integration of Indian Princely States". However, compared to its size, the little state of Janjira played a disproportionately large role in history. The people manning the fort came from North Africa (Ethiopia/Somalia) and were followers of Islam. They were known to be the best sea fighters anywhere among the Muslim races and called themselves Siddis (a North African term of respect). While they were called Siddis in India’s west coast, they were known as Habshis in rest of India. After arriving via the sea as slaves in many different batches through the time, they served under several Muslim Kingdoms in India.

From ancient times, Konkan’s power was run from places that could be used to dock ships/boats. Elephanta had a glorious past. In the fifteenth century, Kolis’ most important fortification was Janjira. Late in fifteenth century, the Siddis (as agents of the Sultan) wrested control of Janjira from the local people who (as the history suggests) had defied the Sultan. Given its situation, the fort’s keepers held on for long. The takeover of Janjira became a long drawn military operation and was conducted directly under the supervision of the NIzam Shahi rulers of Deccan. On capture of fort, the “Koli garrison (was) tied to chains and thrown into, the sea” (Gazetteer). After gaining control of Janjira, Ahmad Shah built a fort, with the objective of complete control of the sea-route and placed his Siddi slave Yaqut as the chief. The one sq km large fort is built of solid rocks that have weathered the cruel sea for centuries.
JANJIRA: on a monsoon day
On my visit, I was amazed to see that the stone bricks held together so well, despite being tormented endlessly by the sea and sea winds. On closer examination, one could even see shining piece of cement filling the gap between rock bricks. A local informed me that the cement's ingredients were brought by the Siddis from Africa. There was no way of knowing the truth behind the cement. At least some of the Siddis are believed to have been sea pirates in the North African waters and had trade links there, though mostly as servants of Arabs. Almost all the Siddis were brought as slaves by the Arabs on to Indian shores. The slaves were converted to Islam on the ship, before being bought by their Muslim masters. Muslims kingdoms in India generated a constant source of demand for African slaves. Everyone remembers Dharmendra playing Yaqoot in the movie Razia Sultan. Yaqoot was among the earliest black slaves from Africa --- belonging to what are the Siddis. The slaves rose in power, as their skills were proven and the ocean skills of the Siddis was apparent to the rulers.

The Habshis were feared in India. They were physically powerful, known to be detached from personal bondings and were fearless. This last quality had probably created quite an impact. Habshi fighters would not be afraid of being outnumbered in a contest, even if it meant defeat or death. Their habits too had created a psychological impact. For example, Badr, governor of a province in North India during Ibn Battuta’s visit, was known for eating a whole goat for meal and killing and captivating “infidels” continuously and “single handedly”. Habshi bodyguards and slave fighters were used by their masters to intimidate their subjects and force them to submit, as needed. Even though in general they were mistreated by their masters, including being severely physically abused, a significant number of them rose to power while functioning on behalf of their masters. People in general feared them. In Bengal towards the end of the fifteenth century, Habshi military personnel of the King assassinated him, and Habshi Sidi Badr ruled the state with utmost tyranny and cruelty. This had probably the largest Habshi army of around 5000 strong. But people just couldn’t take it and fought them in few years. Badr was killed in the end and the Siddis were driven permanently out of Bengal.

With a Siddi as the fort's warden and some more as officers, a number of Siddis sought employment and settled in the land area around Janjira in the fifteenth century. The principal occupation for the Siddis was always fighting. They established a firm control over the area. Headquartered in Janjira, the Siddis were a menace to everyone at some point in time -- the Marathas, the Moguls, Bijapur, Portuguese and the English. The Siddis had a small territory in Gujarat too. And ferried their forces between these bases, raiding whatever came in their way in this sea route. In time, they tried to exercise independent control over the area spearheaded by its most prominent leader ever on Indian soil. This was Malik Amber. Early in the 17th century, Amber worked as a slave General for the Deccan empire of Ahmednagar. Towards the twilight years of the Ahmednagar dynasty, Amber served as the vizier for its Queen. After the Queen was murdered, Amber wrested control of the empire (of what was left of it), holding the city of Daulatabad. He imprisoned the throne's successor for life. The Mughal Emperor Jehangir sent many contingents to fight Amber to acquire the Deccan. Amber had mastered the art of Guerrilla warfare in these terrains. Emperor Shah Jahan continued the assault. But Amber evaded subjugation to Moguls. Even at worst of the times, Amber succeeded in holding the fort of Janjira and also the Danda fort opposite it on the mainland. After Amber's death, his successors continued to prove useful to the Deccan powers. Probably this influence of the Siddis helped them to keep the land mass around Janjira secured for themselves.

As Shivaji began to turn into a powerful force, the Mogul emperor Aurangzeb recruited the Siddis to head the Imperial Naval interests in the Arabian Sea. In any case, all Muslim empires in India by then depended on the Siddis to defend the Arabian Sea (commercial route) from pirates and more importantly, secure the Haj route. Ibn Battuta noted that so fearsome were the Siddis on sea that “let there be but one of them on ship and it will be avoided by the Indian pirates”. These men “are the guarantors of safety on the Indian Ocean”. Most sailors during that era on the Indian waters were Abyssinians (Siddis). Siddis continued to be source of constant irritation to Shivaji, submitting the land areas whenever the Maratha forces attacked them, to retreat into the fort of Janjira. And once the Maratha forces would be recalled, the Abysinnians would sail out of the Sea fort to raid the land areas around it, and recapture the lost ground. "As the Siddis formed a small military aristocracy dominating the vast alien population, their constitution provided for the rule of the ablest, and on the death of the Chief not his son, but the first officer of the fleet succeeded to the Governorship. The Siddi chief of Janjira maintained an efficient fleet, and throughout the 17th century he was officially recognised as the Admiral, at first of Bijapur and latterly of the Mogul empire. There was no native power on the West Coast that would make a stand against him at sea." Notes Sir Jadunath Sarkar, the historian.
Janjira rising from the sea: reaching by boat
Janjira's physical position made it extremely useful to keep a watch on the land areas around it, and to launch an attack at short notice. Its position in the Sea also enabled it to defend itself effectively and to hold on to the fort for months. With around 200 canons mounted on the top of the Fort’s walls, it was easy to fire effectively on enemy vessels, which were additionally vulnerable in open sea. We drove along the white sand beach of Kashid and then through the beautiful beaches of Murud. After crossing Murud, we crossed creek via a bridge and then began a steep drive up the hill. As the road descended from the hill, we were overlooking the Sea. A vast expanse of water and a massive fort far away guarding the waters, as waters entered from between the two hill flanks. We boarded a country made boat driven with oars and reached the fort's giant entrance in 30 mins. It was around noon, and some steps leading up to the fort's entrance were submerged in the Sea. As we climbed up, the vastness of the structures was overwhelming.

Amber was succeeded by Fath (Fateh) Khan. The Khan also held the two forts around Janjira. With these forts as the base, the cultivated area in the vicinity was defended by the Siddis and formed the base of their revenues. The balance is thought to be coming from their control of the Sea routes and taxes therefrom. Of course, we are talking of the medieval ages when the mighty alone could collect taxes and governments were formed with the power of sword and governments were dispatched with the power of the sword. By the time of the Khan, the Ahmednagar dynasty was gone and the other major power left was Bijapur (roughly a decade before Shivaji's battles). The Bijapur government eventually appointed Khan as the Lord of Danda, with the land mass around it forming his revenue base. But the years of such Lordship were limited. Shivaji was a young and ambitious man by the time the Khan had consolidated power. Shivaji had driven the Moguls out of North Konkan, and then out of much of their holdings elsewhere in what is present day Maharashtra. Bijapur had also lost territory and was pushed further South. The awesome myth surrounding the “Habshis” as invincible warriors with demon-like power took some beating, as Fath Khan lost almost all of his land areas to the Marathas and was forced to retreat to Janjira in 1670. And now the Marathas sieged the fort Janjira. With this, the Siddis were left with no piece of land, but for their sea fort. "To the Siddi, the loss of Kolaba (the coastal territory) meant starvation…” In the past, whenever the siege of Janjira by an enemy seemed to fructify, the Siddis had availed of help from someone in opening a warfront in inland areas to force the diversion of enemy’s forces. Against the Marathas, it was Bijapur’s help. This time, no such help was coming forth. The Khan was weary and was ready even for an unfavorable compromise.

The Siddis knew only one thing --- fighting. They were fighting machines. At Janjira, the wars were not for their masters. It was for themselves – a principality of the Siddis. The Siddis had enjoyed patronage from Sultans so far one way or the other. But with Hindu Marathas now becoming lords of all the landscape around them, the battle had more than a dimension. No outsider had ever set foot in this sea fort. And suddenly, now its survival was at danger. Shivaji was keen to depose the Siddis to acquire control over the waters and secure his lands from any possible aggressions from the sea.

Khan’s deputies differed with him. His three people revolted. “They told their countrymen that Fateh Khan was planning to give up the island, and, with their approval, threw Fateh Khan into chains” (Gazetteer). The new Siddi chief sought help from their masters in Bijapur, but were deserted, not wanting to take on Shivaji. But Moguls obliged, diverting the Maratha forces by opening a warfront inland. The siege was off and Siddis could once again breathe. Food stock was replenished inside the Fort and the Siddi now became admiral of the Mogul navy. Surat was the biggest trading center in the East and protection of its waters as well as the entire coastline became Siddi’s job. He had the entire Mogul fleet under his control now.

The fort’s entrance is from the eastern side of the fort, overlooking land across the waters. Once on the fort’s entrance, I realized that it wasn’t exactly what I had expected. Instead of a giant gate opening up straightway, there it was a rocky wall. There were staircases on either sides of the entrance leading up. (ENTRANCE) We climbed up to another level. It was wide open space and we were somewhere on the parapet of the fort. My guide told me that the entire lower level, including the entrance gate was a trap. He told me that the lower level/floor and gate went underwater with every high tide. Canons were mounted systematically on the ramparts.

CANON








FORT VIEW Standing there I could see a large part of the east side of the fort. This was a moment of privilege. No outsider had ever set foot in this invincible fort --- and now commoners like me were seeing it. There were large ruined structures inside. A 3-floor palace of the Siddi royal women, with only walls now surviving – the roof and floors gone.


The Tank


A fresh water lake! Fresh water within saline everywhere for as far eyes can see. The little lake was Janjira's lifeline. Fresh water and fish as supplies, whenever the fort was besieged for months from across the creek? In addition, there is another tank. I was told that the tank harvested rain-water to be used as a supplemental source of water in dry season. The water was deep green, opaque and covered with a layer of moss. The place of former marshal glory now seemed in complete decay. Every important piece inside the walls, now gone. You have to look at the fortifications to imagine what the place would have been.

THE RUINS
My guide throughout avoided any reference to battles, struggles, ships, Islam. These were precisely the most interesting and important aspects of Janjira. I was a bit intrigued. He insisted that the Janjira rock was procured by a rich African merchant via lawful purchase, and fortified for the purpose of protection. I knew this was totally untrue. But why does he not talk the truth? Janjira probably assumed a delicate balance between the religions and between those who were rulers and those who were ruled.

Somewhere not far from the entrance, there is a shrine, rather small. It was dark inside and little could be seen. This Shia shrine relates to Peer Pachaitan – meaning five saints. However, this was more specifically dedicated to the saint called Shah Tahir. Shah Tahir, a Persian, was an important man in Ahmednagar court and influenced the sultan to declare Shia-ism as the state religion. More specifically, Shah Tahir practiced (perpetuated?) Ismaili sect/style. Murud area was allotted to Shah Tahir as his income. Probably that explains why the Siddi wardens of Janjira put a shrine in his name.
THE SHRINE

The Siddis repelled their enemies on many occasions. But as Marathas gained more and more land, demolishing Muslim powers in all of western India, it left the Siddis with ever shrinking options to find outside help from in case of a siege on Janjira. Given its strategic position, Janjira never found difficulty in fending-off small battalions. It waited in calm until the impatient attackers decided to enter water and make an effort to scale the walls of Janjira. The Janjira guns fired, sinking the boats. And water around meant wall scalers could never scale in numbers simultaneously that would help capture the ramparts.

The Western side of the fort overlooked the open, endless Arabian Sea. We saw a large plane-surface land beyond the fort walls. This was probably used to dock supplies from the boats, beyond the view of anyone from the land areas. The Siddis could sail in or sneak out, in the darkness of night without anyone being able to estimate the strength of the garrison. The guns pointed out in all directions, including the open sea towards the west-end. To the outsiders, it was not only difficult to make an estimate of how many people manned the fort, but also how long would their food supplies last, or anything about the supply replenishment from sea. Bombay was not far via sea. And the English kept allowing Janira ships to dock in their city, partly because Siddi was Emperor’s admiral and even when Mogul power faded, the Siddis were entertained by Bombay purely on the basis of usefulness.

The Siddis now patrolled the entire coast stretching from South of Janjira to Surat, at the mouth of Tapti. Janjira was constantly busy during this eventful peiod. The Siddis enjoyed the full support from the command at Surat’s Castle and gained influence in the city of Surat too. For nearly forty years until 1713, the Janjira lived through Glory. Backed with Mogul money and command, Janjira plundered Bombay (English), Thane & Vasai (Portuguese), and Raigad district (Marathas). At this point in time, the great seaman Kanhoji Angria* (former admiral of Shivaji’s Navy) joined hands with the Marathas, bringing Janjira’s best days to come under cloud. Angria would attack Siddis from sea and the Marathas on land. Janjira lost much of its possessions in Konkan and a new equilibrium was obtained which froze territories for the next 20 years. Then After the death of Siddi Surul Khan in 1734, a slave Siddi Sambal took over after murdering Khan’s son. Khan’s another son sough Maratha help in winning the power. Marathas aided with the help of their mole general. Now equations were changing with Janjira’s influence and power diminishing. Janjira’s generals acceded, Khan’s son was made the chief and Marathas took away more of Janjira’s land territories. Also with this, the tradition of inducting as chief, the first officer of fleet, ended. Instead, started a hereditary rule.

As the Mogul administration weakened, Siddis took over the command at the Surat Castle for a little while, but continued to be guardians of sea on behalf of Delhi and got paid for it. For the English, Siddis were an important ally because of growing Maratha power. In 1731, some local landowners of coastal areas had seized some of Surat’s ships. The Siddis arrested them and the landlords paid as ransom (to escape death as punishment?) a piece of land. This was the port of Jafarabad whose lighthouse is so popular with conservationists today. (Jafarabad is pretty close to the present day Pipavav Port --- an efficient private port of modern India, built recently). Jafarabad was important to the British as it supplied them with livestock for meat. Meat was not available anywhere else in the entire coast because Marathas (Peshwa) had shut all such supply in the Konkan. The last line of supply was the various Portuguese colonies. But in 1738 and 1739, the Marathas had erased the Portuguese out of the scene.

With less number of forces now left to aid Janjira (Portuguese and Moguls were gone), Marathas attacked Janjira once again. This was the year 1760. Marathas had been somewhat eroded because of Panipat and the English were emboldened after gaining India’s East (Plassey, 1757). Janjira pleaded and received British support. British flag was hoisted on Janjira and Marathas respected it. Thereafter, both the Marathas and the English left Janjira to its own – realizing that it was not capable of taking on anyone.

In time, British gained more of India. In 1834, Janjira (with its land areas such as Murud) became a princely state under the British. The chief was called Nawab, who subsequently built and shifted to a palace in Murud. But the British seemed to act like a moody lady in treating the chief of this little princely state. Sometimes with warmth in Bombay and sometimes not displaying any care. The Sidis were an important ally of the British for 200 years in the coast, when the British were struggling to set foot. But now with their power reduced, were being severely marginalized. Part of the blame lay with the Siddis whose infighting (between Nawab and Sardars) meant frequent calls for British intermediation in state matters. Each intervention resulted in more of British law and supervision being forced upon.

In 1948, the Janjira was merged with the Union of India.

As we continued our quest inside the fort, the most important part of the fort seemed to be the fresh water lake, which never dries up. Locals say that underground spring aids the lake water. The Lake’s boundaries are populated by ruins. The Palace and the Mosque – the two most important places within the fort, overlooked the lake.

Fresh water lake with the Mosque in background







The palace gate survives. A piece of historical description talked about the gate’s heavy Burmese Teak doors. The ruins clearly indicate that inside the fort, buildings must have been neck-to-neck. With the space being limited and number of inhabitants increasing, the requirement for additional building went up, resulting in crowded construction. After the British flag was hoisted on Janjira, there were no wars. Peace time combined with steady revenue probably added to construction. The west end of the fort was less crowded, with few structures visible. The gate of another unnamed building was gone too and its place was taken by a stone wall.




The fort was taken over by the Archeological Survey of India (ASI) in the 1950s, after independence. But inhabitants of the fort continued to stay in their homes. The condition of all structures continued to deteriorate during the 60s. In 1972, the ASI had the fort evacuated and its inhabitants resettled on mainland. My guide told me that almost all wood was plucked off by the leaving inhabitants and so also the other building material as much as possible, including some stone bricks. As we descended through the staircase into the lake, we noticed a large verandah beneath --- that was used as a cool retreat sitting during summer. And there you think what the place must have been in its heydays.


*Angria is wrongly (in my view – even after taking into account personal bias) described in history as the greatest sea pirate of the East – undefeated for life. While Angria was undefeated for life, he was no different from all others in the vicinity including Portuguese and the English. The only difference was that Angria’s sole permanent enemies were the English, whom he tormented with great pleasure. He was made infamous by the British as a pirate, and most international historians wrote that way under British influence.

The Indian Sanskriti: Out of Stock

Three years ago, I visited a significant city in the Hindi Heartland, with some hope. In Mumbai, I could not procure a couple of well-known Hindi books. Thus, apart from meeting my family there, this trip was essential. I couldn’t find the books in the first bookstore that I visited. So, moved to the next store. And then from one bookstore to another. But in vein.

All along I kept recalling my visits to these very stores two decades ago. The bookstores then stocked literary works of Hindi writers and Hindi versions of other great works. I remember buying Anton Chekhov’s works in Hindi, Premchand Munshi and even less known authors. And now none were to be found in the city that produced great Hindi poet Narmada Prasad Khare, writer Harishankar Parsai and the great exponent of Hindi Seth Govind Das.

The Last store was the biggest, known to stock all that one needed. My requirement was simple. I needed two collections – one of Harivansh Rai Bachchan and the other from the National Poet Ramdhari Singh Dinkar. I was disappointed here too. A little frustrated, I expressed my disappointment. The Bookstore owner informed me that “these days nobody reads these things”. He added “you seem to have a job; you can (afford to) indulge in these (unproductive) things. But kids here need to make a career”. I looked around in the store. There were quintals of software related books on glass cases covering the walls, from the floor to the 15-feet ceiling. There were books on how to train for management entrance exams. There were also books on how to ‘Learn to Speak English’.

Bigger stores in Mumbai are no different. Some of the best books on India, written in English language are not available. A great and most referenced book on Maratha history had not ever been heard of, in any of Mumbai’s stores! Finally, a passionate bookstore in Kolkata procured an old copy for me. On another occasion, the book that reveals the inside story of the Princely States and Partition, was not available anywhere. Bookstores have not heard of it.

One of the most successful civilizations has probably been of the Arabs. With little resources, they have been at the centre of power for too long. And it was their ability for documentation and preservation that helped them do it. They have neatly maintained diaries dating back over millennium. Even the relatively less literate Mongols (Mughals) were probably better than us in terms of documentation of history and learning from it. Babur reprimanded his son (Humayun) from warfields in Central Asia, through letters, for his poor writing abilities. And of course, we know of the British in modern times. Minute details of the 18th century Indian courts are available to us through diaries of the English employees of the East India Company. But there are practically no accounts written by Indians (other than court writers in Medieval India) about their own times. At least none survives.

No wonder younger generations in India treats its heritage with such little regard. The walls and surfaces of priceless historical monuments are defaced to write “Ravi loves Ritu”. We have a history of indifference.

Jodha Akbar


Last week I saw Ashutosh Gwarikar’s Jodha Akbar.

Some background: Akbar was an embodiment of many contrary traits. He was great at war. And he was sensitive. A turbulent India, torn by bloody violence and looting since Ghazni set foot, was finally returned to peace. Some exceptional principles of governance and administrative structures were commissioned, that helped keep the country powerful and as one until Aurangazeb’s ascent. Akbar was tolerant off the war field. He cultivated art and literature.

Hritik Roshan seemed a fair representation of the warrior-intellectual emperor. For, he looked martial and yet sensitive. There is little image/information about Jodhabai to make any comparison. At the outset, this movie does not seem to be an attempt at serious portrayal of Akbar’s life or society at the time. Rather, it appears to be a commercial venture into bringing the important issues in Akbar’s life, using the canvas of his union with Jodhabai. And it has done that very well.

The movie is probably just a bit more than half way mark into history. Details obviously scripted. There isn’t probably any independent real account into the details. The Mongols (Mughals, in Persian) were nowhere near the Arabs in documentation, meticulousness or even tradition. The Mongols were relatively unorthodox compared to the Turk-Afghan (Slave) dynasty that ruled Delhi before them – and probably that’s why more tolerant (until Aurangzeb).

So many things in the movie make you feel, as if you’ve gone back in time. The movie of course was largely shot in real locations. Thankfully the Agra fort survives. Décor and costumes seem so real – down to minute detail. The Turk turbans, the pots, curtains, utensils.

In subtle ways, the movie captures most of the important issues in Akbar’s rule. There were rulers before him, but with little success in being able to consolidate an empire in turbulent India. What made him successful?

The following account drives the point.

In 1640, Shah Jehan ruled India. That year, a Portuguese priest Sebastien Manrique traveled across the Gangetic lands, from Orissa coast to Bengal, Bihar, and to North India. He had hired a few Muslim bodyguards and guides. While passing through Bengal, the monsoon broke loose. His team had no chance in reaching the Caravan-sarai in next town, and was forced to seek shelter in an unknown village in the middle of the night. The people were kind to admit them in village, but barred them from entering houses because Manrique’s team was meat-eating (Hindus were overwhelmingly pure vegetarians, even in Bengal). So the visitors were housed in a cattle shed. They were though being served with milk and vegetables, while it rained unabated for days. Finally, one of Manrique’s bodyguards, sick with milk & vegetables, grabbed a peacock (village pet) and killed it. The team cooked and ate. They ran away next morning before dawn. The villagers found out in a few hours and chased. Fight ensued, arrows of the villagers versus guns of the European’s team. There were injuries on both sides. The chase ensued until the next town, where the District Administrator resided. Villagers presented their case. The governor ordered arrest of the European team and ordered punishment. Despite Manrique’s articulate defense, the Administrator ruled that under Akbar’s laws (framed a hundred years back), Hindus’ beliefs/customs cannot be breached in Hindu lands. The offender (the Muslim Bodyguard) was sentenced and had his right arm severed.

Akbar’s non-partisan agenda was his biggest strength. He went on to take on his side, the biggest adversaries – the Rajputs. His alliance with the Rajputs and other Hindu chiefs was his biggest strength. This was sealed with his marriage to Jodha. One after another, almost all the Rajput kingdoms were befriended. (The large exception among the Rajputs was Mewar). Jehangir was aided by his Rajput connection. So also Shah Jehan. Shah Jehan’s war general was a Rajput too, who defended the empire’s boundaries at far away lands, even defeating armies in Shah Jehan’s ancestral lands in Central Asia.

The importance of this should be clear from the fact that India was always ruled with the help of Indians. The Slave Dynasty ruled from Delhi (which was a replica of a major Islamic city in those times). The dynasty had control over areas around Delhi and in North, but little beyond that. Hindu chiefs were almost independent, paying tributes only once in a while (in some cases, once in decades). Iltutmish mustered greater control with alliances and his grand infrastructure & welfare projects generated goodwill. The British could rule India only because they received huge support from the natives. By 1930s, the British had lost confidence of at least a vocal minority of the country and found it tough to continue.

The two emperors who indulged in extremism, perished. One was Muhammad bin Tughlaq (Slave dynasty). He was opposed to any conciliatory effort or alliances with the Hindu kings. He managed to antagonize and alienate the Hindu governors (former kings retaining their independence as governor appoint of the emperor) that his great father had cultivated arduously. His morning pastime was torturing captured Hindu kings, followed by stripping their daughters, force them dance in the courtroom and then give them away as gift to any visiting Arab or Persian. Soon, his Hindu governors launched rebellion. Tughlaq spent the rest of his life in an effort to crush rebellion, horse-riding from one part of the country to another. He died on the field.

Aurangazeb’s case was not much different. He was the same kind of religious bigot. He tried to crush Hindu powers, unleashed barbarism. He spent the last twenty years of his life combating Shivaji, but in vein. He died on field, at Deccan, far away from his home Delhi.

In comparison Akbar’s policies were consistent and treated all with equal right.

The Weaker Sex


Among my favorite columnists are Tavleen Singh (IE), Lucy Kellaway (FT), Shekhar Gupta (IE), Veer Sanghvi (HT), John Kay (FT), Arun Shourie (IE), Shobha De (Week). (I have been careful in not mentioning my guru, for it may err on the side of bias). I have greater respect for the intellectual content in all of these writers. But I read the women writers with much greater interest.

Tavleen Singh of Indian Express (New Delhi) writes with enormous fire. She dumps political correctness for some straight talking. Not shying away from what should be apparent and should be told that way. For so many of her male counterparts, it’s regular to seek refuge in words, in order to obscure what is an uneasy truth. Ms Singh has no such pretensions. Nor does she pretend to be a pseudo-secular in a country where the rest of the media & so-called intellectuals are just that. She does not spare cowards & ineffective, either out of fear or for just because they happen to be gentle or honest. The line of thinking is clear.

Lucy Kellaway of Financial Times (London) is not far. While these two ladies write in spheres completely different from each other, their writings have many similar elements. Ms Kellaway ridicules team building exercises revered by the HR departments. She tries to breathe sense into those who labour to understand boss’s jokes as serious humor. Thank god, someone speaks the truth, even if it truth is not always fashionable.

The consistency is even more striking. How week after week, for years these ladies have kept up the onslaught.

Once my guru had remarked: “if there is such thing as a weaker sex, it can’t be women”.

India & Urbanization




One in every 25 indians lives in Delhi or Mumbai. Add Kolkata to it and the figure comes down to 20. Nearly 50 million Indians live in these 3 cities. This is larger than populations of most European countries, or even Australia.

But as a nation, we are reluctant urban.

To be politically correct, you have to say that ‘India is a country of farmers’. The truth of course is far from that. India is actually a country of farm labourers. Nearly 65% of india’s population is engaged in farm related activity in villages. They account for 20% of India’s economic output. And that is why they are poor. Just too many people farming a land area. Again, on paper India has the largest land area under cultivation. But much of that is farce because the land under irrigation is much smaller. As for the land under irrigation, output per unit of land is much lower than in China. In many areas where farmers are reluctant to give up their land for industry, the landholding is roughly an acre (87,000 sq ft) per owner – the size of a kitchen garden! What farming are we talking about?

In the earlier decades, we killed our textile industry much before militant trade-unions hammered the final nail. The government thought textile to be important industry for growth and jobs. Its socialist policies thought it necessary to intervene, and in turn needed the size of each textile manufacturer to be limited. As a result, we nurtured our textile industry into utter un-competitiveness and allowed other countries to catch up, shrinking our share in the world market from more than a third to a less than 1.5%.

This reminds me of a famous international institutional investor saying “China is what it is because of its government, and India is what it is in spite of its government”.

Now we are probably doing that to our farms. Subsidies, more subsidies and loan waivers. For any vibrant economy, the uncompetitive methods need to die and pave way for the more efficient ways. We need efficient farms, to improve farm productivity. We need industrial and city jobs for today’s village folks – the only way to improve their earnings and standard of living. That would need vibrant cities.

But we are still living in a state of denial. Our governments are ashamed of committing funds to make our cities capable of handling more people, more efficiently. Every now and then, erupts a politician pretending to speak for the villages.

Good quality of life is a good thing– and everyone would acknowledge it. Once upon a time, villages provided that. Today villages are in bad shape. Our villages lack basic amenities. To laud village-life as virtuous in current times, while demonizing cities, is self-denial. Denying that the only way to lift a billion people's lives lies is in urban centres.


We need many more Mumbais and Delhis.